My 360 cost eight hundred dollars? Er, no.
And as for the video drivers, what the fuck are you talking about? For certain high-powered games, you need certain high-powered video drivers to play them, which cost money. So....

ok firstly, the average xbox with 2 wireless controllers costs about $400 just those things, plus all the games which are extremely overpriced, (lets just say 5 games) 1 game = $40 - $50. so 5x lets say $45 = $225 so thats $625. as for the video drive, i have not heard about it even once, so im guessing not many games need it. rendering it not as useful. oh yes, lets add that $50 for the video drive. $675. civilization is not a AAA game for one thing so it shouldn't need a video drive. and the average xbox is usually 700 and up. you dont have alot of games so it's different. if i hadn't bought a used one it would be well over $1000

Just because crap games like Warcraft don't need it...
Basically every game made in the year 2005 and up needs a 128mb video card, stupid.

first of all, warcraft is for the computer not xbox, and if you are so sure that most games need the video thing, then why don't any of mine? unless it's always installed into the xbox. but my point is proven already.. ps3 is better

You rpoint is entirely unproven.

more proven than yours

No. All you've done is made a moron of yourself not knowing what video drivers are. Neither point is proven terribly well.

adam, I said corey, and the online connection is better but the graphics on 360 are wayy better, anyway, why did you get a 360 if you like ps3 so much? personaly I lik e nintendo 64 the best lmfao, it's original, it has all the zelda games, witch is all I really need, you may ask "if all you need is nintendo 64 then why did you buy a 360"? good question, the only reason that I bought a 360 was mainly for guitar hero and blitz the league, obveiously thoses two games do not come for nintendo 64, I wish.

ok i didnt know what a video driver is, so what i still have proven my point much better than you have. all you have stated is that the graphics are better, and some games need a video card. and julius, this might sound weird but, i like xbox360's more, but ps3's are the better system

For the video driver bit you're missing the point.
A good computer with a good video driver obsoletes a PS3 ntirely, but the same does not apply to an Xbox.

no, i think you are missing the point, the point is that the ps3 is the better system. not becaue of certain accessories or whatever, overall it is the best system out there. because its cheap, has very high detail games, more realistic games, more AAA games, free online + browsers and no viruses, and much more. xbox games come out fast and most of the AAA games arent very realistic. actually, there has been only one AAA game on the 360 which is halo. and look at that? you regain health over 5 seconds, you dont die from a headshot. like wtf? MGS4 this is a very high detail game, with very realistic bits, and so on.

I don't want to debate this anymore, you're wrong. You just refuse to listen to logic.

i refuse to listen!!! haha your wrong, ps3 is much better firstly, and you are the one who refuses to listen. im saying whats better about the ps3 and you go rambling on about some video drive

oh yeah and one more thing corey, ps3 is better graphics too. ps3 is blue-ray and xbox isn't.he ps3 has such a powerful processor that the US military uses 2 of them for their super computers. blue-ray wiped out hd dvds for picture and quality

oh yeah, and also, you know when you said theres an interesting device called a mouse? well a USB mouse and keyboard can be added. you were talking about a video driver well the US military uses the processor and the ps3 supports blue-ray graphics